CIPP-E EXAM CERTIFICATION - CIPP-E RELEVANT ANSWERS

CIPP-E Exam Certification - CIPP-E Relevant Answers

CIPP-E Exam Certification - CIPP-E Relevant Answers

Blog Article

Tags: CIPP-E Exam Certification, CIPP-E Relevant Answers, Valid CIPP-E Test Camp, CIPP-E Advanced Testing Engine, CIPP-E Latest Dumps Questions

2025 Latest PremiumVCEDump CIPP-E PDF Dumps and CIPP-E Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=14OKcFB4qMyiF3YBXfpbfqHbPKOo-dfpq

Nowadays, flexible study methods become more and more popular with the development of the electronic products. The latest technologies have been applied to our CIPP-E actual exam as well since we are at the most leading position in this field. You can get a complete new and pleasant study experience with our CIPP-E Study Materials. Besides, you have varied choices for there are three versions of our CIPP-E practice materials. At the same time, you are bound to pass the CIPP-E exam and get your desired certification for the validity and accuracy of our CIPP-E study materials.

The CIPP-E Exam consists of 90 multiple-choice questions that must be completed within two and a half hours. CIPP-E exam is challenging, and it requires a thorough understanding of the laws and regulations governing data protection in Europe. To prepare for the exam, candidates are advised to review the IAPP's official study materials, which cover all of the topics that will be tested.

>> CIPP-E Exam Certification <<

CIPP-E Relevant Answers - Valid CIPP-E Test Camp

CIPP-E training materials are famous for high quality, and we have received many good feedbacks from our customers. CIPP-E exam materials are compiled by skilled professionals, and they possess the professional knowledge for the exam, therefore, you can use them at ease. In addition, CIPP-E training materials contain both questions and answers, and it’s convenient for you to have a check after practicing. Yu can receive download link and password within ten minutes after paying for CIPP-E Exam Braindumps, it’s convenient. If you don’t receive, you can contact us, and we will solve this problem for you as quickly as possible.

IAPP CIPP-E certification is an essential qualification for anyone working in the field of data privacy and protection in Europe. Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe (CIPP/E) certification exam is designed to test a candidate's knowledge and understanding of European data protection laws and practices, and passing the exam can help advance a privacy professional's career and increase their earning potential. Additionally, CIPP-E holders are part of a global community of privacy professionals and have access to the latest industry developments, networking opportunities, and job openings.

IAPP Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe (CIPP/E) Sample Questions (Q234-Q239):

NEW QUESTION # 234
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Joe is the new privacy manager for Who-R-U, a Canadian business that provides DNA analysis. The company is headquartered in Montreal, and all of its employees are located there. The company offers its services to Canadians only: Its website is in English and French, it accepts only Canadian currency, and it blocks internet traffic from outside of copyright (although this solution doesn't prevent all non-Canadian traffic). It also declines to process orders that request the DNA report to be sent outside of copyright, and returns orders that show a non-Canadian return address.
Bob, the President of Who-R-U, thinks there is a lot of interest for the product in the EU, and the company is exploring a number of plans to expand its customer base.
The first plan, collegially called We-Track-U, will use an app to collect information about its current Canadian customer base. The expansion will allow its Canadian customers to use the app while traveling abroad. He suggests that the company use this app to gather location information. If the plan shows promise, Bob proposes to use push notifications and text messages to encourage existing customers to pre-register for an EU version of the service. Bob calls this work plan, We-Text-U. Once the company has gathered enough pre- registrations, it will develop EU-specific content and services.
Another plan is called Customer for Life. The idea is to offer additional services through the company's app, like storage and sharing of DNA information with other applications and medical providers. The company's contract says that it can keep customer DNA indefinitely, and use it to offer new services and market them to customers. It also says that customers agree not to withdraw direct marketing consent. Paul, the marketing director, suggests that the company should fully exploit these provisions, and that it can work around customers' attempts to withdraw consent because the contract invalidates them.
The final plan is to develop a brand presence in the EU. The company has already begun this process. It is in the process of purchasing the naming rights for a building in Germany, which would come with a few offices that Who-R-U executives can use while traveling internationally. The office doesn't include any technology or infrastructure; rather, it's simply a room with a desk and some chairs.
On a recent trip concerning the naming-rights deal, Bob's laptop is stolen. The laptop held unencrypted DNA reports on 5,000 Who-R-U customers, all of whom are residents of Canad a. The reports include customer name, birthdate, ethnicity, racial background, names of relatives, gender, and occasionally health information.
The Customer for Life plan may conflict with which GDPR provision?

  • A. Article 7, which requires consent to be as easy to withdraw as it is to give.
  • B. Article 16, which provides data subjects with a rights to rectification.
  • C. Article 6, which requires processing to be lawful.
  • D. Article 20, which gives data subjects a right to data portability.

Answer: A


NEW QUESTION # 235
Once an organization has conducted an internal investigation to determine the scope of a ransomware attack, what is the appropriate next step in the process?

  • A. Inform all customers and the public via social media platforms to ensure rapid dissemination of relevant information.
  • B. Notify law enforcement and consult with legal counsel to understand the implications of the breach and the notification requirements.
  • C. Wait for law enforcement to provide guidance on notification procedures before taking any further action.
  • D. Assess the risks associated with the breach and, if necessary, notify affected individuals and regulatory bodies within the relevant timeframes.

Answer: D

Explanation:
After determining the scope of a ransomware attack, the organization should assess the risks associated with the breach. This risk assessment will help determine whether notification of affected individuals and regulatory bodies is required. If notification is required, it should be done within the relevant timeframes.
Reference:
IAPP CIPP/E textbook, Chapter 5: Data Breach Notification
IAPP CIPP/E Study Guide, Domain 3: Incident Response


NEW QUESTION # 236
Articles 13 and 14 of the GDPR provide details on the obligation of data controllers to inform data subjects when collecting personal dat a. However, both articles specify an exemption for situations in which the data subject already has the information.
Which other situation would also exempt the data controller from this obligation under Article 14?

  • A. When providing the information would involve a disproportionate effort
  • B. When the personal data was obtained through multiple source in the public domain
  • C. When the personal data was obtained 5 years before the entry into force of the GDPR
  • D. When providing the information would go against a police order.

Answer: A

Explanation:
According to Article 14 of the GDPR, the data controller must provide the data subject with certain information when collecting personal data from a source other than the data subject1. However, there are some exceptions to this obligation, such as when the data subject already has the information, or when the provision of such information proves impossible or would involve a disproportionate effort2. The latter exception may apply, for example, when the personal data are collected from a large number of sources, or when the personal data are processed for archiving purposes in the public interest, scientific or historical research purposes or statistical purposes3. The data controller must take appropriate measures to protect the data subject's rights and interests, and make the information publicly available2. Reference: 1: Art. 14 GDPR - Information to be provided where personal data have not been obtained from the data subject2: Article 14(5)(b) of the GDPR3: Recital 62 of the GDPR.


NEW QUESTION # 237
A German data subject was the victim of an embarrassing prank 20 years ago. A newspaper website published an article about the prank at the time, and the article is still available on the newspaper's website. Unfortunately, the prank is the top search result when a user searches on the victim's name. The data subject requests that SearchCo delist this result. SearchCo agrees, and instructs its technology team to avoid scanning or indexing the article. What else must SearchCo do?

  • A. Notify the newspaper that its article it is delisting the article.
  • B. Fully erase the URL to the content, as opposed to delist which is mainly based on data subject's name.
  • C. Prevent the article from being listed in search results no matter what search terms are entered into the search engine.
  • D. Identify other controllers who are processing the same information and inform them of the delisting request.

Answer: A

Explanation:
According to the European Data Protection Law & Practice textbook, page 326, "the CJEU held that the search engine operator is obliged to remove from the list of results displayed following a search made on the basis of a person's name links to web pages, published by third parties and containing information relating to that person, also in a case where that name or information is not erased beforehand or simultaneously from those web pages, and even, as the case may be, when its publication in itself on those pages is lawful." However, the CJEU also stated that "the operator of the search engine as the person responsible for that processing must, at the latest on the occasion of the erasure from its list of results, disclose to the operator of the web page containing that information the fact that that web page will no longer appear in the search engine's results following a search made on the basis of the data subject's name." Therefore, SearchCo must notify the newspaper that it is delisting the article, as part of its obligation to respect the data subject's right to be forgotten. Reference:
European Data Protection Law & Practice, page 326
CJEU Judgment in Case C-131/12 Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos, Mario Costeja Gonzalez, paragraphs 88 and 93


NEW QUESTION # 238
Article 58 of the GDPR describes the power of supervisory authorities. Which of the following is NOT among those granted?

  • A. Authorization and advisory powers.
  • B. Investigatory powers.
  • C. Corrective powers.
  • D. Legislative powers.

Answer: D

Explanation:
Reference:
Article 58 of the GDPR lists the powers of supervisory authorities, which include investigative, corrective, and authorization and advisory powers. However, legislative powers are not among those granted to supervisory authorities, as they belong to the EU and the member states. Therefore, option A is the correct answer. Reference: Art. 58 GDPR - Powers, Article 58 Powers - GDPR, Article 58 GDPR - GDPRhub


NEW QUESTION # 239
......

CIPP-E Relevant Answers: https://www.premiumvcedump.com/IAPP/valid-CIPP-E-premium-vce-exam-dumps.html

2025 Latest PremiumVCEDump CIPP-E PDF Dumps and CIPP-E Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=14OKcFB4qMyiF3YBXfpbfqHbPKOo-dfpq

Report this page